Legal Opinion · Dissent

James v. Commissioner of Economic Security

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 18, 1984No. C8-84-479Published

1DissentCrippen, Judge

Believing that the decision of the Commissioner should be reversed and remanded, I respectfully dissent.

Our review of the Commissioner’s decision involves a dual standard. We must defer to the special knowledge of the Commissioner and avoid substituting our judgment for his. But, we must closely scrutinize his decision and intervene when he has failed to give “reasoned consideration to all material facts and issues.” Greater Boston Television Corporation v. F.C.C., 444 F.2d 841, 851 (D.C.Cir.1970), certiorari denied, 403 U.S. 923, 91 S.Ct. 2229, 29 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971).1 See Reserve Mining Co.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. James v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API