James v. Commissioner of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1DissentCrippen, Judge
Believing that the decision of the Commissioner should be reversed and remanded, I respectfully dissent.
Our review of the Commissioner’s decision involves a dual standard. We must defer to the special knowledge of the Commissioner and avoid substituting our judgment for his. But, we must closely scrutinize his decision and intervene when he has failed to give “reasoned consideration to all material facts and issues.” Greater Boston Television Corporation v. F.C.C., 444 F.2d 841, 851 (D.C.Cir.1970), certiorari denied, 403 U.S. 923, 91 S.Ct. 2229, 29 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971).1 See Reserve Mining Co.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- James v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983