Legal Opinion
Williams v. Amerisure Ins. Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 13, 2000No. Docket Nos. 114169-114171, COA Nos. 171299, 176861, 177052PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
607 N.W.2d 78 (2000)
Darl S. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Darl S. Williams, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Organic Chemicals, Inc., Principal Defendant-Appellee, and
Amerisure Insurance Company, Garnishee Defendant-Appellee.
Docket Nos. 114169-114171, COA Nos. 171299, 176861, 177052.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
March 13, 2000.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the February 5, 1999, decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- United Transportation Union v. State Bar of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lakeland Regional Health System v. Walgreens Health Initiatives, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009