Ackerman v. Ackerman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause why the satisfaction of a judgment should not be vacated.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Depue, J.
The plaintiff, in November, 1868, recovered upon the verdict of a jury a judgment against the defendant *174for $4000 debt and $89.26 costs. In November, 1879, satisfaction of the judgment was entered of record in virtue of a power of attorney made for that purpose. The plaintiff now applies to have that satisfaction set aside and vacated on the ground that it was procured by fraud.’
A court of law may, where the rights of third persons have not intervened, cancel the satisfaction of record of its own judgment, if the same was procured by fraud or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Steele v. WhiteNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Adams v. . SageNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Parsons v. HughesNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jonathan Joseph v. American Honda Finance CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- Meyner v. TurtletaubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991