Legal Opinion

State v. Pinsky

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 4, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

6 N.J. Super. 90 (1950)

70 A.2d 182

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

NATHAN PINSKY AND ANOTHER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 5, 1949.

Decided January 4, 1950.

Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW.

Mr. Charles V. Webb, Jr., argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Duane E. Minard, Jr., Essex County Prosecutor) (Mr. C. William Caruso, Legal Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel).

Mr. Samuel I. Kessler argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Mr. Max L. Rosenstein, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HauptmannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. State v. MacQueenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  3. State v. LyonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  4. State v. FuerstenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
  5. Curtis, Graham & Blatchford v. LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. VanderhaveNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Eleuteri v. RichmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. State v. CarboneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API