Legal Opinion

McGeagh v. Nordberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant, P. N. Nordberg, from an order of the Municipal Court of the City of Minneapolis, Stephen Mahoney, J., made September 21, 1892, denying his motion for a new trial. cited Biggs v. Lloyd, 70 Cal. 447; Elliott v. Caldwell, 43 Minn. 357; Mareotte v. Beaupre, 15 Minn. 152, (Gil. 117;) Lace v. Fixen, 39 Minn. 46; St. Paul & Sioux City R. Co. v. Gardner, 19 Minn. 132, (Gil. 99;) Deering v. McCarthy, 36 Minn. 302. cited Conneau v. Geis, 73 Cal. 176; Adams v.…

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendant, P. N. Nordberg, from an order of the Municipal Court of the City of Minneapolis, Stephen Mahoney, J., made September 21, 1892, denying his motion for a new trial. cited Biggs v. Lloyd, 70 Cal. 447; Elliott v. Caldwell, 43 Minn. 357; Mareotte v. Beaupre, 15 Minn. 152, (Gil. 117;) Lace v. Fixen, 39 Minn. 46; St. Paul & Sioux City R. Co. v. Gardner, 19 Minn. 132, (Gil. 99;) Deering v. McCarthy, 36 Minn. 302. cited Conneau v. Geis, 73 Cal. 176; Adams v. Corriston, 7 Minn. 456, (Gil. 365;) Stadler v. Hertz, 13 Lea, 315; Bailey v. Joy, 132 Mass. 356; Venine v. Archibald, 3…

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was an action to recover for services as agent or broker in securing a loan for defendant. In Ms original complaint the plaintiff declared on an express contract to pay a specified amount. When the case was called, both parties waived a jury, and the trial was commenced before the court. On the trial the plaintiff offered evidence of the reasonable value of bis services, wMch was excluded as not being admissible under the pleadings. Thereupon the plaintiff asked and obtained leave to amend Ms complaint so as to allege an implied contract to pay what the services Avere reasonably worth,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. CorristonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
  2. Inglee v. WellesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Antoine Rumel LittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Gary Realty Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. Inglee v. WellesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. State of Minnesota v. Antoine Rumel LittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API