Gale ex rel. Gale v. Tuerk
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WALDEN, Chief Judge.
This is a negligence action. Appellants were the plaintiffs and appellees, the de*262fendants. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs’ third amended complaint with prejudice. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse.
Our task on appeal is to determine if plaintiffs’ third amended complaint states a cause of action. In this connection we are limited to a review of the material contained within the four corners of the complaint and must accept the well plead allegations of the complaint as true. Maloy, Fla.Appellate Proc. & Prac., § 10.06.
Plaintiffs allege that, at the invitation of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burdine's, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Adler v. CopelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Jackson v. PikeSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hix v. BillenSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Graham v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Pinson v. BarlowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Maxymow v. Lake Maggiore Baptist ChurchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Phillips ex rel. Phillips v. PhillipsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.