Legal Opinion

Bellino v. Strelecki

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 23, 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

121 N.J. Super. 331 (1972)

297 A.2d 15

CATHERINE BELLINO, FRANK BELLINO AND LOUISE FREEMAN, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

JUNE D. STRELECKI, DIRECTOR OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF NEW JERSEY, AND ANTHONY ANZALONE, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided June 23, 1972.

Mr. Francis Sorin, attorney for plaintiffs.

Mr. Irwin L. Facher for defendants (Messrs. Zucker, Lowenstein, Gurny and Zucker, attorneys).

BILDER, J.S.C.

The issue raised here is whether R. 4:42-11(b), providing for interest on tort judgments, applies to the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund.

The subject rule is mandatory in nature and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crudup v. MarreroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. Lindsay v. BolesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Lynch v. HeymannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Salas v. WangCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Boyd v. MariniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. Salas ex rel. Salas v. WangCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Wilton v. Cycle Trucking, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  5. Knowles v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API