Legal Opinion

City of Emporia v. Emporia Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1913No. 17,859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Lyon district court.

1Opinion of the Court

*444The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

It was held in the former opinion that the provisions of the old ordinance prescribing rates for telephone service accepted and long acquiesced in by the company should be upheld against the company which continued in the full enjoyment of the privileges granted by its terms. This conclusion was challenged in a petition for rehearing, which was allowed.

When the opinion was written it was believed that the appellee relied principally upon the claim that the new ordinance was in effect, and the proposition submitted for rehearing was treated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Manitowoc v. Manitowoc & Northern Traction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People ex rel. Jackson v. Suburban RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. City of St. Louis v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. City of Leavenworth v. RankinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
  5. Chicago General Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Saylors v. State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. City of Emporia v. Emporia Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Public Service Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1921
  5. City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API