Gonzales v. Levy Strauss & Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice.
Appellants, Amalia “Molly” Gonzales and Isabel Maldonado, assert that Levy Strauss & Co. (“Levi Strauss”) and Roger Banks fired them in violation of the Texas Right to Work Act. We hold that the appellants did not state a cause of action under the Act; therefore, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
BACKGROUND
The appellants are non-union, supervisory-level employees of Levi Strauss, who determined that another employee, En-riqueta Martinez, was violating company rules by working “off the clock.” 1 Mar tinez is the local union president. Levi Strauss later…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Moore v. K Mart Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corporation, Whm Custom Services, Inc., and Disa, Inc. v. Gilberto RinconesTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Austin v. Inet Technologies, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- Randy L. Yeske v. Piazza Del Arte, Inc., Swiss International, Inc., D/B/A Swiss Builders, Tino Bekardi, David E. Kassab and Paul GarnneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Bryant v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Gilberto Rincones v. Whm Custom Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.