Legal Opinion

Ashbaugh v. Edgecomb

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1859PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Lagrange Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Suit by appellee against appellant, to recover the value of certain wheat. Trial, and verdict for the plaintiff; motion in arrest overruled, and judgment.

The appellant assigns three errors; the first of which relates to the ruling of the Court on the admission of evidence. We shall not further notice it, as there was no motion for a new trial, and the motion in arrest affirms the verdict. Anthony v. Lewis, 8 Ind. R. 339.

The second and third errors assigned are, that the Court erred in impanneling a jury and trying the action by it, when a jury, formerly impanneled to try it, remained…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harris v. Doe, on the Demise of BarnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Butler v. McMillenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  2. Leas v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. State ex rel. Nicholson v. Knox Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API