Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Chae v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 18, 1989No. 88SC47Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Vollack

I concur with Part II of the majority’s opinion that the district court’s suspended sentence was an improper sentence. The majority concludes that Chae’s plea must be vacated because the district court’s illegal sentence was an integral part of the plea agreement. See maj. op. at 485. I dissent because I believe that under the facts of this case Chae entered a knowing and voluntary plea, and the court’s illegal suspended sentence did not invalidate the voluntariness of the plea. After a Crim.P. 35(c) hearing, the court corrected the illegality in the sentence and the defendant received the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. William Richard MinorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Forbert v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Bird v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  5. People v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API