Legal Opinion

Meinken v. Burgess

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1993No. S92G1252Published

1Opinion of the Court

262 Ga. 863 (1993)

426 S.E.2d 876

MEINKEN

v.

BURGESS et al.

S92G1252.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided March 15, 1993.

Glenn Zell, Rodney Zell, for appellant.

Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, J. Thomas Morgan III, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellees.

SEARS-COLLINS, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that a person with an incomplete arrest record can never have his arrest record expunged under OCGA § 35-3-37 (c) but instead can only have his arrest record supplemented. Burgess v. Meinken, 204 Ga. App. 600,…

Also in this document: Dissent · Hunstein; Dissent · Mills.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Police Commissioner v. Municipal Court of Dorchester DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. City of Pepper Pike v. DoeOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. City of Roswell v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  5. State v. C. S. B.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API