Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Bolte

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 2010No. 0730310; A139055PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Wife appeals from a judgment of dissolution. She assigns error to the trial court’s property division and spousal support award. We write only to address wife’s assignment of error relating to spousal support in which she asserts that the trial court erred in awarding her $1,500 per month in indefinite support. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3) (2007), we conclude that the trial court’s spousal support award was not just and equitable and modify the dissolution judgment accordingly.

We take the following relevant facts from the record. Husband and wife were born in 1957. They were married for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of CullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. In re the Marriage of PottsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. In re the Marriage of StutzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of BolteOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In re the Marriage of LoganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API