Case Wagon Co. v. Wolfenden
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Juneau, County. Tbe case is sufficiently stated in tbe opinion. Tbe defendant Wolfenden appealed from a judgment in favor of tbe plaintiff for tbe amount due upon tbe notes. Besides tbe cases cited in tbe opinion, they cited, to tbe point that tbe detriment or inconvenience to tbe defendants was a sufficient consideration for the bond: laythoarp v. Bryant, S Scott, 250; Hemes V. Smith, 2 Lev. 122; Sturbyn v. Albany, Oro.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Juneau, County. Tbe case is sufficiently stated in tbe opinion. Tbe defendant Wolfenden appealed from a judgment in favor of tbe plaintiff for tbe amount due upon tbe notes. Besides tbe cases cited in tbe opinion, they cited, to tbe point that tbe detriment or inconvenience to tbe defendants was a sufficient consideration for the bond: laythoarp v. Bryant, S Scott, 250; Hemes V. Smith, 2 Lev. 122; Sturbyn v. Albany, Oro. Eliz. 01; Will&inson v. Olmevru, 1 Bing. N. C. 490; JBroohs v. Ball, 18 Johns. 337; Austyn v. McLwre, 4 Dali. 226.
1Opinion of the CourtORtoN, J.
The corporation known as the “Wonewoc Manufacturing Company” had given its notes for over $3,000 to one Embark, and the defendant and others had signed the same as sureties. Said company had given chattel mortgages to certain banks to secure certain indebtedness thereto. It had also made an assignment for the benefit of its creditors. It was indebted to the defendant and several other citizens of Wonewoc in various sums, and several of them had been sureties upon its paper. It was deemed of great interest to their town that said manufacturing establishment should be maintained and kept in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eyerts v. AgnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
- Jackson v. StackhouseNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- White v. DingleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Cuyler v. CuylerNew York Supreme Court · 1807
- Robinson v. GodfreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Case Wagon Co. v. WolfendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886