Legal Opinion

F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Grimmer

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 2, 1992No. 2910311PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

F.W. Woolworth Co. contacted James Grimmer, a real estate broker, to negotiate a sublease with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. The sublease between Woolworth and Wal-Mart was entered into on February 11, 1984 with Grimmer's assistance. On March 26, 1984 Woolworth and Grimmer entered into a Real Estate Broker's Commission Agreement, wherein Woolworth agreed to pay Grimmer four percent of the minimum rent received by Woolworth on the sublease. The agreement provided, in pertinent part, the following:

"1. Landlord shall pay the Broker a real estate broker's leasing commission in an amount equal to four…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. CITICORP PERSON-TO-PERSON FINANCIAL CENTERSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Babcock v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Files v. Variety Wholesalers, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cain v. SaundersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  2. Aerotek, Inc. v. BurtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Bain v. GartrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  4. Holmes v. HolmesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. In Re Colonial Bancgroup, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API