Legal Opinion

Fort Hamilton Development Corp. v. Bay Ridge Towers, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

*336OPINION OF THE COURT

Melvin S. Barasch, J.

In this proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law §§ 611 and 619, petitioners Fort Hamilton Development Corp. (Fort Hamilton), Mark P. Madias, and Peter M. Madias (collectively, petitioners) move, by order to show cause, for an order: (1) certifying that petitioners Peter M. Madias and Mark P. Madias, respondents Martin Spencer and James Gallo, and Edward Monahan constitute and were duly elected to the Board of Directors of respondent Bay Ridge Towers, Inc. (BRT) by a majority of the ballots cast at the annual meeting held on May 16, 2001, (2)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rego Park Gardens Associates. v. Rego Park Gardens Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Park Briar Associates v. Park Briar Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Flagg Court Realty Co. v. Flagg Court Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Yu v. LintonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Madison v. StrigglesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API