Legal Opinion

Pierce County Ex Rel. Dunbar v. Campbell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1934No. 24474. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

— This action was brought by Pierce" county, as plaintiff, on the relation of the Attorney General, against Fremont Campbell, Jr., W. V. Zelinsky, and the Continental Casualty Company, defendants, to recover moneys belonging to Pierce county, alleged to have been misappropriated by Zelinsky while serving as deputy county auditor under Campbell. In the original complaint, plaintiff sued upon two causes of action. The first sought recovery against the above named defendants; the second sought recovery on account of defalcations of Zelinsky under de fendant Campbell’s successor in office. . The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. StirratWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Skagit County v. American Bonding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Skagit County v. American Bonding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. O'Connell v. EngenWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Stevens County ex rel. Tim Rasmussen v. Travelers Surety & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API