Legal Opinion

Moreno v. Naylor

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 4, 2010No. A10A0865PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Chief Judge.

Violanda Moreno filed the underlying personal injury lawsuit against Loretta Diane Naylor six days before the expiration of the two-year statute of limitation, 1 but did not serve process on her until almost four months after the statute of limitation had run, and then only by publication. The trial court granted Naylor’s motion to dismiss on the ground that Moreno had not acted with the required diligence in effecting service. Moreno appeals, arguing (i) the exercise of due diligence as foreclosing dismissal, and (ii) due diligence as established by the trial court’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sykes v. SpringerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Davis v. BushnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Williams v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Green v. CimafrancaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. James Giles v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Ragan v. MallowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Heather Ragan v. Derek MallowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Heather Ragan v. Derek MallowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API