Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1989No. 88-1517PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

Robert L. Johnson was found guilty of violating prison rules and was disciplined at four different hearings. He filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, challenging whether the disciplinary proceedings met the due process requirements of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). The trial court denied his petition, but the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed. Johnson v. State, 564 So.2d 999 (Ala.Cr.App.1989). That court held that the disciplinary board’s statements of the evidence relied upon in two of the hearings were insufficient. The State…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ex Parte HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API