Hall v. . Harris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Cause removed from the Court of Equity of Montgomery County, at the Spring Term 1848. The facts in this case are fully stated in a case between the same parties, Hall v. Harris, 3 Ired. Equity 289, and so much of them as is necessary to the understanding of the decision now made is set forth in the opinion of the Court here delivered.
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
When this case was before this Court at June Term 1844, it was decided, that an execution does not bind equitable interests and rights of redemption from its teste, as in ordinary cases, but from the time of “exc cution served and it was declared that the plaintiff would be entitled to a decree, provided the deed, under which he claimed, took effect before the execution, under which the defendant Harris claimed, was issued. 3 Ired. Eq 289.
We are satisfied, that the view then taken of the case was correct. The rights of the parlies depend upon that' single question.
The execution issued on the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Buchanan v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Lynch v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Craddock v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Robbins v. . RascoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Lynch v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.