Legal Opinion

Stoppenbach v. Sweeney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 22, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging the sufficiency of the designating petition naming respondent John E. Sweeney (hereinafter respondent) as the Independence Party candidate for Member of Congress for the 20th Congressional District in this year’s primary election. Supreme Court ruled in favor of petitioner, finding 69 of the 616 signatures on respondent’s designating petition to be invalid and leaving respondent with 547 valid signatures compared with the required 591 (see Election Law § 6-136).

On these cross appeals,* the parties focus on the signatures that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Frome v. Bd. of Elections of Nassau CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Molinari v. PowersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  3. Zobel v. New York State of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Ligammari v. NorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API