Legal Opinion

Dornbusch v. Board of Adjustment of Newark

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 5, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This matter is before me on return of an order to show cause why complainants should not have the relief prayed for in the bill of complaint, and restraining the defendant David Harper and the board of adjustment of the city of Newark from revoking a permit issued to the complainant on November 8th, 1933, by the superintendent of buildings for an addition to an existing gasoline station at numbers 789-791 Sandford avenue, Newark, New Jersey, to be used as an automobile laundry.

Acting upon the permit, the work of erecting the addition was commenced, and a portion of the addition was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ostrowsky v. NewarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  2. Eaton v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  3. Gibbs Building, C., Co. v. BellevilleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  4. McCormick v. Mayor of New BrunswickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 179 Duncan Ave. Co. v. SpoererNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  2. Kolodny v. Quality Bilt Furniture Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API