Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Brooks

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1900Published

Motion by defendants for an extra allowance of costa.

1Opinion of the CourtHiscock, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff as a taxpayer based upon the general ground of alleged wastefulness, to restrain the defendants from “ auditing, authorizing or allowing the payment ” of the sum of $13,761.95, or any portion of the same to Stone, Gannon & Petit, or to Charles L. Stone, as a balance for legal services claimed to have been rendered. The case was tried *451before a referee, and judgment has been had for the defendants, dismissing the complaint.

The necessary certificate of the referee, before whom the case was tried, is furnished upon this motion, and there is little dispute upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hart v. MayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Barker v. Town of OswegatchieNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Gordon v. StrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API