Legal Opinion

Fasken v. Fasken

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1922No. 1370Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

Upon consideration of the motion for rehearing filed by appellant it was deemed advisable to certify to the Supreme Court the correctness of our ruling that the letters between the parties quoted in the main opinion were admissible in evidence. The Supreme Court has answered the question and held the same admissible, 260 S. W. 701.

*701This was the only question which we deemed doubtful and upon the other issues there is no occasion to add to what has been said in the main opinion.

The motion is overruled.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fasken v. FaskenTexas Supreme Court · 1924