Legal Opinion

Zurfluh v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1902No. Sac. No. 975PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

On the 16th of January, 1894, the plaintiff (whose name was then Josephine Gerig) was a minor, and Jacob Gebert, deceased, was appointed guardian of her estate. There was at said time in the hands of said guardian $662.83, the property of plaintiff, and he executed his official bond as such guardian, with appellants as sureties. In May, 1899, Gebert died, without having filed any account, and having made no settlement with his ward. The defendant Smith was appointed administrator of the estate of Gebert, deceased.

This action was brought to have the accounts of the deceased guardian…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Slater v. McAvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Donnell v. DansbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. King v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Alexandrou v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. BurtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Southern Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API