Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Better Monkey Grip Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1957No. 16278PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Sec. 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.), seeks enforcement of its order. 1 The respondent insists: (1) that the Board’s factual findings are not supported by substantial evidence; (2) that the Court should remand the proceedings for the purpose of adducing additional testimony; and (3) that the Board’s conclusion that respondent’s conduct violated Sec. 8(a) (1) of the Act was improper.

For reasons sufficiently appearing in the Board’s decision, we are of opinion that substantial evidence on the record as a whole…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Talladega Cotton Factory, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  2. Eugen Pedersen v. National Labor Relations Board, Modern Linen & Laundry Service, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Local No. 207, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers Union v. PerkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Oil City Brass Works v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Southland Paint Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Schill Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Dal-Tex Optical Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API