Legal Opinion
State v. Clark
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided April 7, 1928No. 28,061PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
The defendant was convicted of the felony defined by R. S. 21-937, the pertinent part of which declares—
*792“Any person, who shall knowingly . . . persuade, induce, entice, or procure, or assist in persuading, inducing, enticing or procuring any female person for the purpose of prostitution ... or concubinage . . . to go from one place to another within this state for the purpose of prostitution . . . or concubinage shall be deemed guilty of a felony.”
The information with preliminary recitals alleged:
“That heretofore and to wit on or about the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SchweiterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- State v. FleemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- State v. BusseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- State v. LongtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- State v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BalliroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- State v. GillenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- State v. FinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.