Legal Opinion
Harber v. Shaffer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 27, 1988No. 70294PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RAPP, Special Justice.*
The petitioner, Charles C. Harber, seeks application of criminal statutory sentence reduction credits to his present period of *641confinement for civil indirect contempt. We, after assuming jurisdiction, deny.
This matter comes before us because the petitioner, Harber, refused to obey an order of the trial court issued for the benefit of another party. Harber was, after refusal, subsequently cited for contempt, tried by jury and determined to be guilty of civil indirect contempt. The trial court thereafter ordered Harber to be confined for six months1 and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Beloit v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- WRG Construction Co. v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Ex Parte GudenogeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Green v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- World Publishing Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Compsource Mut. Ins. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- COMPSOURCE MUTUAL INSUR. CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLA. TAX COMM. and OKLA. ASSOC. OF ELECTRIC SELF INSURERS FUND v. STATE OF OKLA. TAX COMM.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Sommer v. SommerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Henry v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.