Anzine v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United Stales for the Eirst Division of the Northern District of California; Wm. C. Van Fleet, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Andrew Anzine. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was found guilty under five counts of an indictment charging him with maintaining a house of ill fame at 83 Eddy street, in San Francisco, in violation of section 13 of the act to authorize the President to increase temporarily the military establishment of the United States, approved May 18, *8281917 (40 Stat. 83, c. 15 [Comp. St. 1918, § 2019b, Append.]), and the order of the Secretary of War made in pursuance thereof on July 25, 1917.
[ 1 ] Error is assigned to the admission of' testimony to prove the general reputation of the house maintained…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Wooster v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Betts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- State v. BrunellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Drake v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Merrill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee v. RaneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1925
- State v. TacconiUtah Supreme Court · 1946