Legal Opinion

State v. Pearce

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 24, 1976No. AA-435PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

336 So.2d 1274 (1976)

The STATE of Florida, Appellant,

v.

James David PEARCE and William Lee Kinner, Appellees.

No. AA-435.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 24, 1976.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Donald K. Rudser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellant.

A.K. Black, Lake City, for appellees.

SUBSTITUTED OPINION ON REHEARING

SMITH, Judge.

The State appeals from an order dismissing the information against appellees Pearce and Kinner on the ground they were not given a speedy trial as required by Rule 3.191, R.Cr.P. The 180-day period prescribed by the Rule expired…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Butler v. CullenSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. In Re Florida Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. Albury v. City of Jacksonville BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. State v. BarnettSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  4. State v. SmailDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Jenkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API