Legal Opinion

City of Richmond v. Williams & Bowe

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 16, 1904PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Chancery Court of the city of Richmond, in an interpleader suit, in which hill was filed by the appellees, Williams & Bowe, trustees, against the appellant and others to determine the ownership of certain funds in the hands, or under the control, of the complainants.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

On the 14th day of October, 1889, C. E. Belvin was the owner in fee of certain real estate, situated in that section adjacent to the city of Richmond known as “Lee District,” and on that date he conveyed the whole of said real estate to O. U. Williams and R". W. Bowe, trustees, in trust to secure the payment of the sum of $13,440, evidenced by nine negotiable notes of even date with the deed, which deed was duly recorded in the clerk’s office of Henrico County Court on October 17, 1889. On the 19th day of Eehruary, 1892, an act of the General Assembly of. Virginia was passed (Acts 1891-’2, p.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Turpin v. LemonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Provident Institution for Savings v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Chapman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  4. Voigt v. Detroit CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Williams v. Lord & RobinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. MoroneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Nalle v. EavesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Drainage Commissioners of Washington County District, No. 4 v. Eastern Home & Farm Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. BlackUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Powers v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API