Legal Opinion

In re Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 21, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1999. He maintained an office for the practice of law in New Jersey where he was admitted in 1998.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey, by order dated September 20, 2005, temporarily suspended respondent from the practice of law until further order of that court. The order was based on a petition by the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics submitting clear evidence that respondent had neglected client matters, made apparent thefts from two clients, failed to explain a trust account overdraft, and failed to communicate with clients, the courts,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re ConnollyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API