Moosbrugger v. Walsh
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Angela E. Moosbrugger against Anna Walsh and Maggie L. Walsh to enforce defendants’ personal liability as stockholders of the Pleasant Valley Vintage Company, for the debts of said company. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.
The action is founded upon the alleged fact that the plaintiff was a creditor of the Pleasant Valley Vintage Company, and that defendants, as its stockholders, were liable to her as such creditor because the whole amount of the capital stock had not been paid in and certificate thereof filed. The referee found that the company was duly incorporated in July, 1891, pursuant to Laws 1890, c. 567, with a capital stock of $12,000; that in March, 1892, the capital stock was increased to $35,000; that the company continued business from the time of its incorporation until September, 1892, when…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Veeder v. . MudgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Kincaid v. . DwinelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Bosley v. National MacHine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Griffeth v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- Meholin v. CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Crocker v. HuntzickerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Citizens' National Bank v. FondaNew York Supreme Court · 1896
- White Corbin & Co. v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899