Legal Opinion

General Electric Co. v. Chattanooga Coal & Iron Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1917No. 2902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In, Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee; Edward T. Sanford, Judge. .Action by the General Electric Company against the Chattanooga Coal & Iron Corporation. Jtidgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

The General Electric Company sued the Chattanooga Coal & Iron Corporation for the purchase price of a turbo-compressor, or blowing engine, manufactured by plaintiff for use in connection with defendant’s blast furnace, under contract between plaintiff and the receiver of defendant’s predecessor corporation, which contract defendant assumed. Defendant refused to accept the machine, because not completed within the time contracted for. By agreement between the parties, plaintiff sold the machine, realizing $4,000 less than its contract price, and for this sum recovery was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Northwestern Steam Boiler & Mfg. Co. v. Great Lakes Engineering WorksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. LeRoy Dyal Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  2. FS Investments, Inc. v. Asset Guaranty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2002
  3. Gill v. Hale & Kilburn Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  4. Keller v. BaumgartnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API