Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Coatesville Boiler Works

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County

Decided March 10, 1930No. 802Published

1Opinion of the Court

Winkle, J.,

Plaintiffs filed this bill in equity, setting forth that the defendant is about to erect and operate, on the property owned by it near their residences, a plant for fabrication of boilers, and that the operation thereof with the attendant noises will constitute a continuing nuisance, and praying that an injunction issue restraining such action by defendant and other relief. Defendant in its answer admits that it proposes to erect the plant described by plaintiffs, but denies that it will constitute a nuisance and that plaintiffs are entitled to the relief sought. Upon the issue…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Piro v. ShipleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. City of New Castle v. RaneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Mowday v. Moore, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1890
  4. Perret v. PerretSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Vandivort v. HunterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API