Pagano v. Arnstein
New York Court of Appeals
The judgment in the Schaeffler case does not bar this action. (Jasper v. Rosinski, 228 N. T. 349; Lien Co. v. 213 N. Y. 9; Merchants’ Rank v. Thomson et al., 55 N. Y. 11; Emigrant Industrial Savings Ramie v. Goldman, 75 N. Y. 127; Second National Rank of Gooperstown v. Calvert, 152 Mise. 884; Mal-loney v. Koran, 49 N. Y. Ill; Schuylkill Fuel Gorp. v. Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N. Y. 304; Rrown v. Gallaudet, 80 N. Y. 413; Rosenberg v. Slotchin, 181 App.
Read the full summary
The judgment in the Schaeffler case does not bar this action. (Jasper v. Rosinski, 228 N. T. 349; Lien Co. v. 213 N. Y. 9; Merchants’ Rank v. Thomson et al., 55 N. Y. 11; Emigrant Industrial Savings Ramie v. Goldman, 75 N. Y. 127; Second National Rank of Gooperstown v. Calvert, 152 Mise. 884; Mal-loney v. Koran, 49 N. Y. Ill; Schuylkill Fuel Gorp. v. Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N. Y. 304; Rrown v. Gallaudet, 80 N. Y. 413; Rosenberg v. Slotchin, 181 App. Div.'137; Robinson v. Whitaker Nos. 1-4, 205 App. Div. 286; Stannard v, Kubbell, 123 N. Y. 520.) Appellant is barred in this action by tbe rule…
1Opinion of the Court
Lehman, Cb. J.
Tbe complaint in this action has been dismissed on tbe ground that a prior adjudication conclusively bars tbe plaintiff from asserting tbe cause of action pleaded in tbe complaint. Tbe sole question presented upon this appeal is whether tbe matter pleaded in tbe complaint has been litigated or could have been litigated in tbe prior action and “ tbe substance of tbe rights or interests established in tbe first action will be destroyed or impaired by tbe prosecution of tbe second. ’ ’ (Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N. Y. 304, 306, 307, 308.)
We state briefly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. . Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Hatch v. . Central National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Susquehanna Steamship Co. v. A. O. Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In Matter of City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Koblitz v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Bonde v. General Security Insurance Co. of CanadaNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- In re the Estate of PayneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
- People ex rel. McGoldrick v. Baldwin Gardens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Albero v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.