Legal Opinion

Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. v. Barletta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 26, 1968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment rendered for plaintiff following nonjury trial unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs and disbursements to abide the event, and new trial directed in the interests of justice. Under the agreements of the parties, the testing of the television station relay equipment, including a satisfactory performance thereof on such testing in accordance with the agreed specifications, was *535a condition precedent to liability for the alleged balance owing to Du Mont. The pleadings, if not adequate in their statements, must be considered amended to present the issues relating to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Roe v. SmythNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Varagnolo v. Partola Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Varagnolo v. Partola Manufacturing CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marotta v. BlauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Abyssinian Development Corp. v. BistricerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Abyssinian Development Corp. v. BistricerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API