Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ballard v. 1400 Willow Council of Co-Owners, Inc.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2013No. Nos. 2010-SC-000533-DG, 2011-SC-000584-DGPublished

1DissentNoble, J.

I differ with the majority’s well written opinion only on the point that a non-profit corporation owes no fiduciary duty to individuals who own property in the building. The nonprofit at issue here is the Council of Co-owners that governs the use of the property for all the owners, in the owner’s dual roles as the collective unit of owners, and as individuals who are an owner. The individual owner in this case is Patricia Ballard.

Before getting to the substance, I must emphasize that Ballard has two relationships with the Council. See, e.g., Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn., 42 Cal.3d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Joel R. Gaff v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Ranier v. Mount Sterling National BankKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cigal v. Leader Development Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API