Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Suren v. Oceanic S. S. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1936No. 7894Published

1ConcurrenceHaney, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result, but cannot subscribe to the application of the doctrine of res judicata to the facts herein, for two reasons: (1) In considering a defense raised by demurrer, the court may consider only the facts pleaded,1 and the same rule is applicable here because exceptions in admiralty raise the defenses ordinarily raised by demurrer; (2) even if facts are considered in connection with a demurrer other than those pleaded, such facts show affirmatively that this proceeding is not barred by res judicata.

With respect to the first proposition, the defense of res judicata may be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pacific Steamship Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Robb v. VosSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Rose v. . HawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Cuff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API