Commonwealth v. Trimarchi
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
This is an appeal by a defendant from a sentence after verdict for selling beer to a minor. The defendant, as the sole ground for reversal, contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the district attorney in his opening address to the jury made irrelevant remarks that were prejudicial to the rights of the defendant. We are all of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.
At the conclusion of the district attorney’s opening address to the jury, counsel for defendant made this motion: “We ask for the withdrawal of a juror on account of the prejudicial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. NicelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Commonwealth v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth v. BubnisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Commonwealth v. WestwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. MazarellaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Commonwealth v. LynottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Commonwealth v. DeMarcoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth v. FryPerry County Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1941