Legal Opinion
Hupp v. Canal Insurance Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 28, 1995No. 47A04-9409-CV-365PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHEZEM, Judge.
Case Summary
Appellant-plaintiff, Clifton Hupp ("Hupp"), appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee-defendant, Canal Insurance Co. ("Canal"). We affirm.
Issue
Hupp presents two issues for review, which we consolidate and restate as follows: whether the insurance policy obligated Canal to provide uninsured/underinsured motorist ("UM/UIM") coverage in an amount equal to the policy's limit of liability for bodily injury coverage.
Facts and Procedural History
On January 10, 1991, Hupp was involved in an accident while driving a vehicle owned by his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keating v. BurtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Selleck v. Westfield Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Marathon Petroleum Co. v. Colonial Motel Properties, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. National Insurance Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. LoweIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Yin v. Society National Bank IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- State Auto Ins. Companies v. ShannonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Conrad v. Universal Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Yin v. Society National Bank IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996