Legal Opinion

Newman v. Stuart

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1992No. 07-CA-59568PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Curtis Newman, investigator for the Mississippi Highway Safety Patrol (MHP), and MHP appeal a judgment of the circuit court of Jackson County directing them to return a stolen pickup truck, which had been delivered by its owner, Motors Insurance Corporation (MIC), to Walter H. Stuart, an innocent purchaser of the stolen vehicle. The basis of the court's decision directing return of the vehicle was that it had been delivered by MHP to MIC without a judicial determination of its right to do so. Finding the court erred in directing return of the vehicle and assessment of damages under the facts…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bevill v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People Ex Rel. Robert Simpson Co. v. KempnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Schillberg v. Everett District Justice CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Sawyer v. GableDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Lawrence v. MullinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. AgeeNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Steven A. DeLoge' v. Desoto County Sheriff DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  3. Roderick v. City of Gulfport, Miss.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2000
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1998
  5. Eisenberg v. Grand Bank for Savings, FSBDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API