Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. United Mine Workers of America

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 13, 1970No. 18056PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

The National Labor Relations’ Soar’d (“Board”), pursuant to Section.lp.(e.j>of the National Labor Relations Ac.t, .29 U. S.C. § 160(e), seeks enforcement ’ of Its November 8, 1968, Order1 issued.against respondents United Mine Workers., of America (“UMW”), United Mine; Wor&7 ers of America, District 2 ’’’(‘’‘District 2”), and United Mine Workers • of America, Local 6796 (“Local 67&6”)'i?2 The Board found that respondents UMW, District 2 and Local 679.6-Kad‘.vi-olated Section 8(b) (1) (A) of the Actf 29 U.S.C. § 158(b) (1) (A), by restraining and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
Hughes v. Superior Court of Cal. for Contra Costa Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
Local 542, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
National Labor Relations Board v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
Leo Walton v. Arabian American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. United Mine Workers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970