Legal Opinion

Claim of Manigault v. W. H. Beaumont & Son

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

It is conceded that the general business of the employer does not bring it within the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Its liability, if any, falls under the particular hazardous employment designated in group 7 of subdivision 1 of section 3 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, relating to the operation of hand trucks.

*260The claimant says he was injured while he was engaged in placing a heavy box on what is designated by the manufacturer as a “ dolly; ” and was attempting by means of the dolly to move the box from one part of the shipping room to another as was commonly done. It is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Holtz v. Greenhut & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McGillivary v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API