Fox v. Helmuth
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 7, Oct. T., 1904, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1903, No. 3992, making absolute rule to stay execution in case of G. Percy Fox v. Oliver Helmuth and Mary A. Helmuth. Rule to stay execution. The opinion of the Superior Court states the ease. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
The defendants executed a bond, with a warrant of attorney, accompanying a mortgage, in which they promised to pay to the plaintiff $1,000, within nine years from its date (May 5, *831893), in monthly installments of not less than $10.00 each, and providing “ that if at any time default shall be made in production to the obligee, .... on or before the first day of November of each and every year of receipts for taxes of the current year assessed upon the premises, then and in such case the whole principal debt shall at the option of the obligee .... become due and payable…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. VandergriftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Girard Life Insurance v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Warwick Iron Co. v. MortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Atkinson v. WaltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Jones v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lehnert v. Newark Realty Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1930
- Shoemaker v. HardingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905