Legal Opinion

Weissman v. Naitove

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hagarty, J.:

The action is in equity between the immediate parties to two negotiable notes, payable February 9 and February 25, 1925, respectively. The plaintiff’s claim is that they are void because in the hands of innocent holders for value, because that which the statute has declared void cannot be made valid by passing through the channels of trade. (Sabine v. Paine, 223 N. Y. 401.) The single exception to this rule is made by section 114 of the Banking Law of this State (as amd. by Laws of 1922, chap. 623) and the Federal statutes applicable to National banks that a bank which purchases…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Sabine v. . PaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Schlesinger v. . GilhoolyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Wickwire v. WarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. Wickwire v. . WarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paolillo v. Atlantic Macaroni Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API