Legal Opinion

Ragni v. Butterfield

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 28, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 12085PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PICARD, District Judge.

By this action against the District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, plaintiff seeks judicial review under Section 10 of the Administrative Procedures Act, 60 Stat. 243, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009, of an order of deportation affirmed July 18, 1952, by the Board of Immigration Appeals. Defendant has moved to dismiss on the grounds that (1) this court has no jurisdiction under Section 10 of the Administrative Procedures Act, and (2) the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization and/or the Attorney General of the United States are indispensable parties and cannot be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heikkila v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Williams v. FanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Hynes, Regional Director, Fish & Wildlife Service v. Grimes Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Paolo v. GarfinkelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  5. De Pinho Vaz v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pedreiro v. Shaughnessy, District Director of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API