Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barnes v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1990No. 88-SC-831-MRPublished

1DissentWintersheimer, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because it was not reversible error for the trial judge to admit hearsay evidence relating to the conduct of Barnes and it was not error to introduce evidence of his prior uncharged misconduct.

Barnes was charged with the shotgun murder of his wife. His defense was that the shooting was accidental. There was a history of marital discord and violence.

Although I can agree with some of the comments made in the majority opinion regarding hearsay evidence, I believe the affidavit evidence presented here falls clearly within an exception to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Matthews v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. O'Bryan v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Scruggs v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Privitt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API