Legal Opinion
Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLC
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 15, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00840Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No.: 3:18-cv-840-GPC-BGS IN RE OUTLAW LABORATORY, LP consolidated with 3:18-cv-1882-GPC- 12 LITIGATION BGS 13 ORDER 14 15 (1) DENYING OUTLAW’S MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS [ECF No. 16 102]; 17 (2) DENYING 18 COUNTERCLAIMANTS’ REQUEST 19 FOR CROSS-SANCTIONS AND TO SHIFT COSTS [ECF No. 104.] 20 21 Before the Court is Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Outlaw Laboratory, LP 22 (“Outlaw”)’s July 29, 2019 motion for Rule 11 sanctions. (ECF No. 102.) Outlaw seeks 23 to sanction Counterclaimants1 for statements made in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re: Keegan Management Co., Securities Litigation. Michael Moore, and Lieff, Cabraser & Heimann Elizabeth J. Cabraser v. Keegan Management Company, a Delaware Corporation, Michael Moore, and Richard L. Jaeger Feldman, Waldman & Kline v. Keegan Management Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Christian v. Mattel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Stuart RommCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.