Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Springfield v. Pointer

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Special Justice Edward J. Smith

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellants, who are creditors of the estate of Henry Pointer, Jr., deceased, seek to subject to levy and ex- ecntion interests, alleged to be vested, devised and bequeathed .to him by the will of his father, Henry Pointer, Sr., which was executed on January 10, 1914, and admitted to probate in the county court of Williamson County on January 19, 1914.

Items 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the will provide:

“Item 1st. I hereby will, devise and bequeath to my beloved wife, Letitia Pointer, all property of every hind, character and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Innes v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Jordan v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Bigley v. WatsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Nichols v. GuthrieTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Rinks v. GordonTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Guilliams v. KoonsmanTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Davis v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  3. Hayes v. Second Nat. Bank of RichmondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Sands v. FlyTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Bedford v. BedfordCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API